Re: Why btrfs inline small file by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/30/2012 08:17 PM, cwillu wrote:
>>> If there is a lot of small files, then the size of metadata will be
>>> undesirable due to deduplication
>>
>> Yes, that is a fact, but if that really matters depends on the use-case
>> (e.g., the small files to large files ratio, ...). But as btrfs is designed
>> explicitly as a general purpose file system, you usually want the good
>> performance instead of the better disk-usage (especially as disk space isn't
>> expensive anymore).
> As I understand it, in basically all cases the total storage used by
> inlining will be _smaller_, as the allocation doesn't need to be
> aligned to the sector size.
>

if i have 10G small files in total, then it will consume 20G by default.

ching
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux