Re: [RFC][V2] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-10-30 10:42, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2012 23:21 +0100, from kreijack@xxxxxxxxx (Goffredo Baroncelli):
>> Hi all,

[...]
> One thing, though; what is the difference between "unused" and
> "unallocated"? If there is no difference, I feel the same word should
> be used throughout.

I had to use "Unused" instead of "Unallocated" because the first one is
shorter. In the tabular output of the command "btrfs fi disk-usage" I
have 10 columns available for every fields. 1 columns is used by the
space character, so I have only 9 characters available for the
description. "Unused" is 6 chars, "Unallocated" is 11 chars....
The only options is to use "Unalloc." (8 chars)...




-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux