Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012 schrieb Michael Kjörling:
> On 27 Oct 2012 18:43 +0200, from Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Martin
Steigerwald):
> > Possibly this could be done tabular as well, like:
> >
> > vdb vdc vdd
> >
> > Data, RAID 0 307,25MB 307,25MB 307,25MB
> > …
> > System,RAID1 - 8MB 8MB
> > …
> > Unused 2,23GB 2,69GB 2,24GB
> >
> >
> >
> > I like this. But what if the filesystem has 100 disks?
>
> Maybe I'm just not familiar enough with btrfs yet to punch an
> immediate hole in the idea, but how about pivoting that table? Columns
> for data values ("data, raid 0", "system, raid 1", "unused", ...) and
> rows for the underlying devices? Something like this, copying the
> numbers from your example. And I'm using colon here rather than comma,
> because I believe that it better captures the intent.
>
> Data: RAID 0 System: RAID 1 Unused
> /dev/vdb 307.25 MB - 2.23 GB
> /dev/vdc 307.25 MB 8 MB 2.69 GB
> /dev/vdd 307.25 MB 8 MB 2.24 GB
> ============ ============== ============
> TOTAL 921.75 MB 16 MB 7.16 GB
Hmmm, good idea. I like it this way around.
It would scale better with the number of drives and there is a good way to
place the totals.
I wonder about how to possibly include the used part of each tree. With
mostly 5 columns it might be doable.
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
