On 02.10.2012 17:27, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:05:43AM -0600, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:32:32AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 08:25:38AM -0600, David Sterba wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:02:59PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>>> @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ struct btrfs_path {
>>>>> unsigned int skip_locking:1;
>>>>> unsigned int leave_spinning:1;
>>>>> unsigned int search_commit_root:1;
>>>>> + unsigned int shecantgoanyfarthercapt:1;
>>>>
>>>> so you did not make it to LWN's quote of the week, can you please rename
>>>> it to something sensible?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see what's unsensible about it.
>>
>> Itsfunnybuthardtoreadanddoesnothelpunderstandingthecodewhereitsused.
>>
>
> Idisagreeithinkithelpstremendouslywiththeunderstandingofthecode,youcantgoanyfarther,butfineineedotaddacommenttobtrfs_next_leafanywaysoi'llnameitsomethingelse,anysuggestions?
>
wecantgoanyfarther
> Josef
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
