Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1884!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:17:47AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> I had a btrfs built on top of 5 drives (dmcrypt devices).
>>
>> The drive then died while I was writing to the filesystem and my system
>> crashed and rebooted:
>>
>> [384555.534020] sd 10:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
>> [384555.535057] sd 10:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
>> [384556.666885] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [384556.667909] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdj] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>> [384556.677509] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3451!
>> [384556.682551] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> [384556.687878] CPU 2
>>
>
> Oh my, now I'm trying again with a new drive, and a big cp from an
> existing array to a new one dies with:
> [32042.079411] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [32042.085799] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1884!
> [32042.092528] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [32042.099227] CPU 1
> [32042.101095] Modules linked in:[32042.105950]  raid456 async_raid6_recov async
> _pq raid6_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx ppdev lp tun autofs4 kl5kusb105
>  ftdi_sio keyspan nfsd nfs lockd fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl sunrpc rc_ati_x10 s
> nd_timer i915 usbserial snd drm_kms_helper eeepc_wmi drm ati_remote asus_wmi rc_
> core sparse_keymap
>
>     int repair_io_failure(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree, u64 start,
>                             u64 length, u64 logical, struct page *page,
>                             int mirror_num)
>     {
>             struct bio *bio;
>             struct btrfs_device *dev;
>             DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(compl);
>             u64 map_length = 0;
>             u64 sector;
>             struct btrfs_bio *bbio = NULL;
>             int ret;
>
>             BUG_ON(!mirror_num); <<<<<
>
> This is more of a problem since I can't backup my filesystem (source is
> ext4 and destination is btrfs).
>
> Any suggestion on what went wrong here?

There should have been a stack trace as well as a couple other things,
can you post those as well please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux