On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 06:23:21PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > On 09/18/2012 01:15 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:56AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > >> This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas, > >> As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots. > >> The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs to grow this > >> as well. > >> > >> Now we're able to fill the blank with this patch, in which we make full use of > >> backref walking stuff. > >> > >> Here is the basic idea, > >> o set the writeback ranges started by defragment with flag EXTENT_DEFRAG > >> o at endio, after we finish updating fs tree, we use backref walking to find > >> all parents of the ranges and re-link them with the new COWed file layout by > >> adding corresponding backrefs. > >> > >> Originally patch by Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I was trying to fixup the rejects on this patch when I noticed there were no > > tabs, only spaces. Thats not going to work and now I have to go back and make > > sure none of your other patches did this. Thanks, > > > > Josef > > > > I'm quite confused about this, my local part and the email part I received show it is well formed. > > There is no spaces, and every time before I send them out, I use checkpatch.pl and make sure > checkpatch.pl does not complain about anything: > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl ~/Desktop/0002-Btrfs-snapshot-aware-defrag.patch > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 647 lines checked > > /home/liubo/Desktop/0002-Btrfs-snapshot-aware-defrag.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > > Anyway, I don't know where goes wrong but I'm attaching it for you. > Yeah I don't know wtf is going on here, that patch turned out fine. I blame exchange ;). Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
