Re: rfc: fuzz testing by direct writes to device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This whole subject was also about using sed to corrupt-o-magic a
file's data on disk.

Is this an acceptable method for testing?

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Michael <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It should not. It is always preferred that you dd your drive onto
> another disk just in case though.
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Shentino <shentino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:59 PM, cwillu <cwillu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> You still haven't said which kernel you were running; the thing to do
>>> is try the very latest rc (if not btrfs-next).
>>
>> Sorry about that!
>>
>> I thought I included it.
>>
>> 3.3.8
>>
>> Hmm...seems it's been EOL'ed.  I need to yell at my distro.
>>
>> In the meantime, will mounting a btrfs filesystem with a new kernel
>> render it unmountable by older kernels?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux