Re: rfc: fuzz testing by direct writes to device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Also, since the problem prevented me from syncing my other filesystmes
I couldn't capture the debug info.

It vanished during the cold boot still sitting in dirty page cache.

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Shentino <shentino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How effective would it be to directly write to the underlying device
> and then running tests to see if the corruption is properly detected?
>
> I just ran a fuzz test by syncing, and then manually corrupting a file
> with the help of a surgical sed (yes, the before and after patterns
> had fixed equal lengths).  First I got an I/O error (expected), then I
> ran scrub and got more problems (not ok), the system froze (not good),
> a reboot failed to mount the system again (worse), and then the fsck
> program dumped core.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux