If we find the block by seach corresponding fs tree, we should return 0, and tell the caller we pass the check. Or btrfsck will fail to read the fs/file tree and report many error message by mistake. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Several days ago, I sent this patch as a reply. Now I send it as a independent patch mail. --- btrfsck.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/btrfsck.c b/btrfsck.c index 4e91769..57e7b57 100644 --- a/btrfsck.c +++ b/btrfsck.c @@ -1954,7 +1954,7 @@ static int check_owner_ref(struct btrfs_root *root, if (buf->start == btrfs_node_blockptr(path.nodes[level + 1], path.slots[level + 1])) - rec->owner_ref_checked = 1; + found = 1; btrfs_release_path(ref_root, &path); return found ? 0 : 1; -- 1.7.6.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
