[PATCH 5/7] Btrfs: fix wrong orphan count of the fs/file tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we add a new orphan item, we should increase the atomic counter,
not decrease it. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 7131fac..cae4c32 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2222,7 +2222,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
 			insert = 1;
 #endif
 		insert = 1;
-		atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+		atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
 	}
 
 	if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
-- 
1.7.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux