On 16.08.2012 15:26, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> On 2012年08月16日 21:23, Arne Jansen wrote:
>> On 16.08.2012 15:17, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>>> Add code indent to the bad styled statements.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> root-tree.c | 10 ++++------
>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
>>> index 782472c..39cfef6 100644
>>> --- a/root-tree.c
>>> +++ b/root-tree.c
>>> @@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> goto out;
>>> if (ret) {
>>> -btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>>> -printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>>> - (unsigned long long)key->objectid,
>>> - key->type,
>>> - (unsigned long long)key->offset);
>>> -
>>
>> I guess Alexander intentionally put in the bad indentation
>> to remind him to remove this code before submitting the
>> patch :)
>>
>>> + btrfs_print_leaf(root, path->nodes[0]);
>>> + printk("failed to del %llu %u %llu\n",
>>> + (unsigned long long)key->objectid, key->type,
>>> + (unsigned long long)key->offset);
>>> }
>
> When I saw the BUG_ON, I wonder do we still need the above branch statement.
> It looks just to be helpful for debug - give out some info, right?
Yes. So either we delete it completely or we move the BUG_ON
into the block as a BUG_ON(1) and add a "Btrfs: "-prefix to the
printk.
On the other hand, I just saw this is progs, so I think it can
just be deleted.
>
>>> BUG_ON(ret != 0);
>>> leaf = path->nodes[0];
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
