On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:21:29 +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:48:02AM +0200, David Sterba wrote: >> and down, no problems so far, and the "wikipedia" test-subvol stresstest >> that caused trouble to one of your patches is also ok. I'll do some more >> testing on other machines and will report problems eventually. > > So it won't be so easy :) > > The test generated 15+ G of data, ~500 snapshots, then umount and fsck: > > lots of > > ref mismatch on [9655283712 4096] extent item 1, found 0 > Incorrect local backref count on 9655283712 root 5 owner 589776 offset 110592 found 0 wanted 1 back 0x86badf0 > backpointer mismatch on [9655283712 4096] > owner ref check failed [9655283712 4096] > > and then > > checking fs roots > root 2854 inode 233882 errors 2500 > root 2880 inode 271639 errors 2200 > > and it's not finished yet, other types of error may pop up. Could you try Arne's patch? [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix race in run_clustered_refs http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=134449329717830&w=2 I run test for several times with this patch, and the problem didn't happen. So it seems this patch can fix the above problem. Regards Miao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
