On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, eric gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Basically, phoronix showed there is a --repair option. After enabling > snapshotting and playing around with the various discussed options, I > discovered that --repair and no special mount options was sufficient > to get the files removable. I'm curious, whether running it directly on newer kernel (e.g. latest ubuntu kernel-ppa/mainline) will be able to "solve" the problem, even without btrfsck. Also note that if by "snapshotting" you mean "create LVM snapshots", then you might be in for another surprise, as btrfs doesn't play nice with block devices with the same fs UUID. Don't rely on that as backup option. > > Now what I'm hoping for is better documentation on btrfsck even if it > just boils down to a brief enumeration of the options as that would be > better than nothing which is what we have now. Do I need to file a bug > or is this sufficient? Edit https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfsck ? -- Fajar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
