Le 03/07/2012 17:22, Hugo Mills a écrit : > What you're seeing is the fact that you've still got the complete ext4 > filesystem and all of its data sitting untouched on the disk as well. > The defrag will have taken a complete new copy of the data but not > removed the ext4 copy. I though about that... However, I had "btrfs su del" the ext2_saved subvolume, so it is expected to have been deleted... If not, how could I possibly delete it, now that I can't see it anymore ? >> It doesn't seem that btrfsck attempts to fix these errors in any >> way... It just displays them. > Correct, by default it just checks the filesystem. Just to be sure: > the filesystems in question weren't mounted, were they? > > No, the filesystems weren't mounted... If by default, btrfsck doesn't fix, how could I ask it to fix ? "man btrfsck" or "btrfsck -h" do not show any option, only a device name... TIA. Kind regards. -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
