Re: Feature request: true RAID-1 mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/25/2012 03:28 PM, Gareth Pye wrote:
> To me one doesn't have to be triggered, a user expects to have to tell
> the disks to rebuild/resync/balance after adding a disk, they may want
> to wait till they've added all 4 disks and run a few extra commands
> before they run the rebalance.

They do?  E.g. mdadm doesn't make them...

> What is important is having a mode that
> doesn't require the user to remember that what they had used as the
> closest analogue to RAID1 that BTRFS supports requires them to run
> another command to change the 'RAID level' to be the RAID1 analogue for
> the new number of disks. 
> 
> Users will forget that and they will lose data because of it. At least
> with a M=N mode BTRFS can say they tried to make it easy to avoid that
> pitfall.

Doesn't that contradict your previous statement?  In either case, I
agree with the latter...
	
	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux