Re: kernel got struck while scrubbing BTRFS with node- and leafsize 32768

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 schrieb Chester:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Martin Steigerwald 
<Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [251818.022631] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [251818.022714] WARNING: at
> > 
> > /media/data/mattems/src/linux-2.6-3.4.1/debian/build/source_amd64_non
> > e/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4522 read_extent_buffer+0x43/0xf0 [btrfs]()
> > [251818.022723] Hardware name: 42433WG
> > [251818.022727] Modules linked in: rose usb_storage uas rfcomm bnep
> > btusb
> 
> I don't think btrfs supported big blocks until recently. Something
> like 3.3 or 3.4.. Anything from 2.6 would definitely not cut it.

As I reported I was using 3.4.

AFAIK it needs 3.4 for big metadata blocks.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux