"root->fs_info" and "fs_info" are the same, but "fs_info" is prefered
because it is shorter and that's what is used in the rest of the
function.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Also, Smatch doesn't understand that they are the same so it complains
about the locking.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index b72b068..e5f1b15 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ loop:
kmem_cache_free(btrfs_transaction_cachep, cur_trans);
cur_trans = fs_info->running_transaction;
goto loop;
- } else if (root->fs_info->fs_state & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_ERROR) {
- spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->trans_lock);
+ } else if (fs_info->fs_state & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_ERROR) {
+ spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
kmem_cache_free(btrfs_transaction_cachep, cur_trans);
return -EROFS;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
