Re: KVM on top of BTRFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roman Mamedov <rm <at> romanrm.ru> writes:

(Machine has no other load at all)

No material difference between cache types (none, writeback and writethrough)
when I tried.
I had been using partition based KVM which is obviously going to
be much faster.

Seems a little unfair on btrfs to just to look at absolutes in this context.
Prior reports said that the fs ground to a halt,
it isn't doing that by any stretch.

The installs are very much diskbound iotop/atop.
More than happy to answer questions and try out things.

I haven't let any of these installs complete and used it as intended.
So that's what I intend to do next; after all one doesn't install every day.







--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux