That one has been around since the addition of backref.c. Due to the way we
calculate our slot numbers, after adding inline refs we're missing one keyed
ref unless it's located at the beginning of a new leaf.
Reported-by: Alexander Block <ablock84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index b41d94a..c69a846 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int __add_inline_refs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
* enumerate all inline refs
*/
leaf = path->nodes[0];
- slot = path->slots[0] - 1;
+ slot = path->slots[0];
item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
BUG_ON(item_size < sizeof(*ei));
@@ -661,8 +661,9 @@ again:
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
int slot;
+ path->slots[0]--;
leaf = path->nodes[0];
- slot = path->slots[0] - 1;
+ slot = path->slots[0];
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
if (key.objectid == bytenr &&
key.type == BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY) {
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
