Re: Which kernel is safe to upgrade to for btrfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/05/12 15:22, Marc MERLIN wrote:

> Have the free space problems been fixed in 3.3.x or is the 3.4.x branch
> better or should I stay with 3.2.x for safety?

There have been some fixes pushed back from the development tree into
the stable tree for 3.3.x (for the first time in btrfs's history I
believe) but there's a lot more work been happening in 3.4.

I'm happily sat on 3.2 and I would suggest sticking there too for a
while and watch what user reports come back for the 3.4 kernel (just out).

Just my 2p's worth..

cheers,
Chris
-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux