On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:08:33PM +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > > I would not buy anything else > > than intel. I have about 26 of them for years now (both in servers and > > workstations, several series), and never had an issue. Two of my > > colleagues have OCZ, and both had to RMA them. > > I guess it boils down wether you want intel also to rule the SSD > market in the long term, as they do with PC processors... > > Comparing intel SSDs with OCZ is not that fair, as OCZ has always been > low-priced bleeding edge stuff. Looking into the controllers... first there were bunch of different ones; Intel had it own design with SSD 320. Then come Sandforce; it got broadly used, despite sucking when used with FDE. Even Intel started to used Sandforce - SSD 520. How's reliabilty of Intel differs? Latest fad is Marvell controller; again Intel joins the pack with SSD510. So, Intel is not that different anymore. -- Tomasz Torcz "God, root, what's the difference?" xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx "God is more forgiving." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
