Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 08.05.12:
>> Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the
>> directory tree does the job.
> Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is telling
> you: The problem you have right now would be the same damn problem,
> no matter what fs you would you. Every fs will be unusable if you
> lose one disk in a raid0 setup. That's all what we are trying to tell
> you for the last 15 mails :)
> If you don't see any benefits using btrfs then simply don't use it
I still hope for a benefit when I use btrfs.
As I've written many times: I want a system for my video collection
which allows
adding a bigger disk
deleting/removing a smaller disk
with simple commands.
btrfs seems to be able to do that (and I have tested this job many
times). But with my configuration "mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid0" I've
(again) seen that all data vanishes when 1 disk fails.
I'll try Hugo's proposal "mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d single".
And I hope that it doesn't make all disks unreadable when 1 disk fails.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
