On 5/8/12 3:13 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Clemens,
Du meintest am 08.05.12:
But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for
repairing an ext2/3/4 system.
Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as
doomed.
Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the
directory tree does the job.
Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is telling
you: The problem you have right now would be the same damn problem, no
matter what fs you would you. Every fs will be unusable if you lose one
disk in a raid0 setup. That's all what we are trying to tell you for the
last 15 mails :)
If you don't see any benefits using btrfs then simply don't use it :)
Again: You misconfigured your fs if you never wanted to use raid0. Don't
blame the fs, blame yourself.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
