On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:43:16AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Is btrfs-zero-log still relevant? I imagine losing several last
> transactions is MUCH more convinient than having to recreate the
> enitre fs (even if restore managed to salvage everything).
IMHO it is, a few days ago this helped one user to mount his filesystem (other
usual steps to recover from unmountable filesystem did not help).
> And what about mont -o ro,recover?
I saw in the logs that the -o recovery must have been used, quoting from the
mail:
> device fsid 97727502-a678-4ed1-a96c-409b852d76bf devid 1 transid
> 135714 /dev/sda4
> btrfs: enabling auto recoveryparent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
> parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
> btrfs: open_ctree failed
and the RO mount does not make any difference here.
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
