Re: Optionally enforced time-based ACLs for BTRFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:30:39PM -0400, David Bruzos wrote:

> Hi BTRFS folks: In my organization, many use cases exist for a
> time-based honoring  field for FS ACLs.  I've done some brief research
> regarding this topic, but I was unable to find any reference to such a
> thing in any file system.  I understand that a feature like time-based
> honoring for ACLs may arguably be something that should exist in
> higher layers (E.G. some document management system), but on the other
> hand, I see no real reason that an extra ACL field that would allow
> for time-based granting/removing of permissions to some user would be
> a problem.

One of the interesting thing about linux acls is the filesystems don't
really implement acls.  We implement xattrs, and the higher layers stuff
acls into them.  In a few key spots we tell the higher layers how to do
that, and we also call back into the higher layers for permission
checks.

This is a long way of saying the changes would have to happen in the
generic acl code.  This is a good thing, it will get much more review
that way.

I'd suggest posting this to linux-fsdevel.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux