Re: block_rsv_check EAGAIN vs ENOSPC...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:50:24PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> With 3.4-rc4 under certain workloads, I see btrfs_block_rsv_check
> return -ENOSPC.
> 
> Since btrfs_block_rsv_check can only return -ENOSPC or 0,
> relocation.c:3816 checks for -EAGAIN, which is either redundant or
> should be -ENOSPC, which I initially suspected.
> 
> Let me know which the behaviour should be and I'll get a patch tested and sent.
> 

Yup you are right, thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux