Hi Chris, On 20.04.2012 09:20, Chris Samuel wrote: > Jan Schmidt was working on a "btrfs send" type command to help with > this, but I've not heard anything recently (last December he posted > that he was distracted by the backref-walking code which was a > necessary precursor for the send/receive code). I still have that in my work queue. Backref walking can be considered quite stable by now, however it's not guaranteed to be consistent in every situation when used on live trees. There's only a few corner cases where it's breaking, but for the qgroup patches, we need to get rid of those. btrfs send would operate on read-only snapshots, where I consider backref walking stable by now. Someone has to push that backref resolving thing on live trees forward, though. So send/receive is by no means forgotten about, but further delayed. -Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
