Re: [PATCH] btrfs: don't return EINTR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:36:20PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > Well then passing a flag down that says we can't interrupt I guess is what we're
> > > going to have to do and just wait uninterruptible.  I think our best bet is to
> > > just fix them as they come up, I thought all system calls could return EINTR but
> > > apparently I was wrong :).  Thanks,
> > 
> > I'd guess that EINTR is unexpected most of the time.  Including in reads
> > and writes.  The real question is how long we might end up waiting?
> > 
> 
> EINTR is valid for both reads and writes.  This was put into place when I would
> run tests and get tired of waiting for them so I'd ctrl+c and it wouldn't stop
> even though it's something that's completely stoppable.  So I'd like to leave it
> in there so at the very least I can still ctrl+c when I accidently run something
> I don't want to run ;).  Thanks,

Ok. lets just teach git how to eintr.


-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux