Re: [PATCH 0/5] btrfs: snapshot deletion via readahead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/17/2012 03:35 PM, Arne Jansen wrote:

> On 13.04.2012 09:43, Liu Bo wrote:
>> On 04/13/2012 03:19 PM, Arne Jansen wrote:
>>
>>> might be out of memory. How much does this vm (?) have?
>>> Can you try to reduce the constants in disk-io.c:2003-2005?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Arne
>>>
>>
>> Seems not related to an OOM:
>> # free -m
>>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
>> Mem:          1973        478       1494          0         49        315
>> -/+ buffers/cache:        113       1859
>> Swap:            0          0          0
>>
>>
> 
> so it seems I've lost a patch along the way that was supposed to fix
> that: "btrfs: fix race in reada". I pushed my tree again with this
> patch on top.
> 
> thanks,
> Arne
> 


OK, I'll apply that patch and take some time to test it again.

thanks,
liubo

>> thanks,
>> liubo 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux