On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:08:15PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Arvin Schnell <aschnell@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > libblocxx is not required for snapper anymore since about a > > month. It's checked during configure. > > You're right. I just tested it, and not having libblocxx during > compilation results in less dependencies (namely libblocxx itself, > plus libssl, libcrypto, and libpcre). > > What functionality, if any, is not available when not using libblocxx? > Since it's still used when present during configure, I assume it's > good for something. It's just used for logging. With blocxx an application linking libsnapper can use blocxx functions to control and redirect logging. Regards, Arvin -- Arvin Schnell, <aschnell@xxxxxxx> Senior Software Engineer, Research & Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
