On 03/09/2012 12:25 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > When testing out 16KB blocks with direct I/O [1] on 3.3-rc6, we > quickly see btrfs_search_slot returning positive numbers, popping an > assertion [2]. > > Are >4KB block sizes known broken for now? > Yes, exactly, the kernel side is not ready for >4K block size, but AFAIK it _is_ on going. thanks, liubo > Thanks, > Daniel > > --- [1] > > mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 -l 16k -n 16k /dev/sda /dev/sdb > mount /dev/sda /store && cd /store > fio /usr/share/doc/fio/examples/iometer-file-access-server > > --- [2] > > kernel BUG at /home/apw/COD/linux/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1481! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
