On 03/09/2012 03:35 AM, Jacek Luczak wrote: > 2012/3/8 David Sterba <dave@xxxxxxxx>: >> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:10:45PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: >>> kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1466! >> 1461 ret = btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata(trans, root, item); >> 1462 /* >> 1463 * we have reserved enough space when we start a new transaction, >> 1464 * so reserving metadata failure is impossible. >> 1465 */ >> 1466 BUG_ON(ret); >> >>> RAX: 00000000ffffffe4 >> ENOSPC >> >>> [<ffffffffa03210e5>] ? __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x172/0x25e [btrfs] >>> [<ffffffffa032158c>] ? btrfs_rename+0x38b/0x55b [btrfs] >> rename reserves 20 blocks, but seems that's not enough. I've never seen >> a crash report in rename, and according to the stacktrace there's >> nothing suspicious (like selinux related). > > There were quite many things happening in the system at that time. > Can't really tell what could trigger this. > > Complete logs: http://91.234.146.107/~difrost/logs/tampere_log.gz > Hi Jacek, So are these warnings based on the latest upstream of btrfs? thanks, liubo > -Jacek > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
