Re: Premature ENOSPC only with zlib Compression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Ahmet Inan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Chris Samuel <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 February 2012 19:06:52 Ahmet Inan wrote:
> >
> >> and got ENOSPC again :(
> >>
> >> so it doesnt matter if lzo or zlib: ENOSPC with compression
> >> enabled!
> >>
> >> my kernel: vanilla 3.2.5
> >
> > I know that there has been an ENOSPC fix go in to the 3.3 RC kernels
> > since the 3.2 release, any chance you'd be able to see if it still
> > happens with the current 3.3 RC ?
> 
> just tested 3.3.0-rc3, and it works like a charm!
> 
> but there are lots of issues with external packages not compiling with 3.3,
> why i wont be able to deploy it to our systems here yet.
> 
> could this one bugfix be backported to 3.2?

All of the btrfs patches in 3.3-rc are against 3.2 in my git tree:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus


> 
> here are some results from my unsquashfs'ing just to show how
> awesome btrfs with lzo is. these results are _not_ from an ssd btw!
> (spinning disks, rebooted between tests)

Very nice ;)

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux