On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Chris Samuel <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 16 February 2012 19:06:52 Ahmet Inan wrote: > >> and got ENOSPC again :( >> >> so it doesnt matter if lzo or zlib: ENOSPC with compression >> enabled! >> >> my kernel: vanilla 3.2.5 > > I know that there has been an ENOSPC fix go in to the 3.3 RC kernels > since the 3.2 release, any chance you'd be able to see if it still > happens with the current 3.3 RC ? just tested 3.3.0-rc3, and it works like a charm! but there are lots of issues with external packages not compiling with 3.3, why i wont be able to deploy it to our systems here yet. could this one bugfix be backported to 3.2? here are some results from my unsquashfs'ing just to show how awesome btrfs with lzo is. these results are _not_ from an ssd btw! (spinning disks, rebooted between tests) # time unsquashfs /dev/nbd0 Parallel unsquashfs: Using 8 processors 792630 inodes (870469 blocks) to write [==================/] 870469/870469 100% created 759645 files created 67271 directories created 27250 symlinks created 5141 devices created 0 fifos Timing Results: zlib: real 6m38.586s user 2m16.021s sys 0m31.138s lzo: real 1m53.429s user 1m55.622s sys 0m46.664s no compression: real 1m16.975s user 1m47.173s sys 0m53.520s complete system installation in under 5minutes, that simply rocks! Ahmet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
