On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <rohbeck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > is it possible to set nodatacow on a per-file basis? I couldn't find anything. > If not, wouldn't that be a great feature to get around the performance issues with VM and database storage? Of course cloning should still cause COW. IIRC this is already a feature in btrfs. I didn't catch the whole talk, but Chris mentioned something like this at Scale 10x. I also remember seeing a patch for it a while back (I think it was from liu bo) that does this. > > Thanks, > Ralf-Peter > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
