The intent here was to do a logical && instead of a bitwise &. The
original condition tests whether they have the some of same bits set.
I have fixed that and rewritten it to be more clear.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Warning: This is a static analysis bug and I'm not very familiar with
the code. Please review carefully.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 0b4e2af..0c54027 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2376,8 +2376,8 @@ static int should_balance_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root,
u64 chunk_type = btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk);
/* type filter */
- if (!((chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) &
- (bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_TYPE_MASK))) {
+ if (!(chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) ||
+ !(bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_TYPE_MASK)) {
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
