Re: Btrfsck gives me errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jérôme Poulin <jeromepoulin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> some files, unmount, and mount it again. If second mount does not show
>> any error message then I'm pretty sure you're safe.
>
> I just upgraded from 3.0 to 3.2.1 and mounted the filesystem, tried
> find > /dev/null and only got messages about old space inode.

That's normal. You'll also get the message if you switch back to 3.0,
but it should be harmless.

> I then
> used btrfsck again for the same exact result, I'll ignore them for
> now, let's see what the shiny new btrfsck will do about them!

who knows when it will be available :)

Then again, most fsck feature has been implemented in kernel space so
a mount will automatically "fix" some types of problems (somewhat
similar to what zfs does, which has no fsck whatsoever). So just watch
syslog for any unusual error messages.

-- 
Fajar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux