> Good point. I'm actually very close to moving from magnetic to SSD > storage for my btrfs volumes. Would my luks layer offset the majority > of any advantage I might otherwise see from SSD? I'd be happy just to > eliminate seektime. Not to my knowledge. > I've been using btrfs on luks now for 6 months and online grow works > fine -- if you online grow the luks container first. (cryptsetup > resize <name>) It does make it a more manual process, I suppose, but > for me it's worth knowing that no part of the filesystem, will ever be > available should a disk be stolen. That is of course true =) That is sort the EXT2/3/4 way of doing it, where it would be very handy if btrfs adapted the ZFS idea, where the FS knows and does everything, where everything is done through the btrfs commands. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
