Re: What is best practice when partitioning a device that holds one or more btr-filesystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Wilfred van Velzen <wvvelzen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gareth Pye <gareth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Wilfred van Velzen <wvvelzen@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> (I'm not interested in what early adopter users do when they are using
>>> rc kernels...)
>>
>> Yet your going to use a FS without a working fsck? That puts you in early
>> adopter territory to me.
>
> Yeah maybe. But I'm still not interested in it regarding partitioning! ;)
>
> But actually I decided not to use it for the production environment.
> The missing working fsck is one of the reasons.
> Although opensuse supports it and Suse Linux Enterprise Server 11 is
> going to support it with their next SP release in Februari, and Fedora
> might use it as default in their next release... Did I miss any?

MeeGo has been using btrfs by default right from the start. In the
current versions, we even install everything in a single btrfs
partition, and use 2 subvolumes (/home and /), and create a factory
reset snapshot of the / filesystem at installation.

Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux