Btrfsck report error 100 after the 83th case of xfstests was run, it means
the i_size of the file is wrong.
The reason of this bug is that:
Btrfs increased i_size of the file at the beginning, but it failed to expand
the file, and failed to update the i_size to the old size because there is no
enough space in the file system, so we found a wrong i_size.
This patch fixes this bug by updating the i_size just when we pass the file
expanding and get enough space to update i-node.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 960818b..f1c4bce 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3373,6 +3373,8 @@ int btrfs_cont_expand(struct inode *inode, loff_t oldsize, loff_t size)
static int btrfs_setsize(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize)
{
+ struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
+ struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
loff_t oldsize = i_size_read(inode);
int ret;
@@ -3380,16 +3382,20 @@ static int btrfs_setsize(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize)
return 0;
if (newsize > oldsize) {
- i_size_write(inode, newsize);
- btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, i_size_read(inode), NULL);
truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, newsize);
ret = btrfs_cont_expand(inode, oldsize, newsize);
- if (ret) {
- btrfs_setsize(inode, oldsize);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- }
- mark_inode_dirty(inode);
+ trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
+ if (IS_ERR(trans))
+ return PTR_ERR(trans);
+
+ i_size_write(inode, newsize);
+ btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, i_size_read(inode), NULL);
+ ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode);
+
+ btrfs_end_transaction_throttle(trans, root);
} else {
/*
--
1.7.6.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
