David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:26:17PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
>> index 8c32434..89cc54e 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
>> +static int trim_no_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
>> + u64 *total_trimmed, u64 start, u64 end, u64 minlen)
>> +{
>> + struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl = block_group->free_space_ctl;
>> + struct btrfs_free_space *entry;
>> + struct rb_node *node;
>> + int ret;
> int ret = 0;
>
> CC [M] fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.o
> fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c: In function trim_no_bitmap:
> fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:2636: warning: ret may be used uninitialized in this function
>
> Although it seems the uninitialized value could never be returned.
>
Actually it's possible. The odd thing is my gcc doesn't complain about this.
Will fix. Thanks!
--
Li Zefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
