Re: fsck with "err is 1"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hallo, Blair,

Du meintest am 23.11.11:

>> I can't answer that, but I can tell you that fsck for btrfs right
>> now is almost useless. It can't fix anyting.

> Thank you, I've read that fsck doesn't fix anything.  I was curious
> if doing the scrub would resolve it.

I had tried ... about 4 Tbyte data have gone.

3 disks bundled with data=raid0, metadata=raid1.

One disk had problems, before I run "scrub" I could read most files,  
Running "scrub": all had gone.

One big problem of btrfs seems to be: you can't see on which partition/ 
disk the defect sector (or something else) may be, if there is 1 error  
in 1 partition you have to restore the complete bundle of disks/ 
partitions.

Yes - I know: btrfs is still under construction.

In my special case: the 4 TByte are a kind of video archive. No  
"valuable" data, only "nice to have". And old people still know the  
behaviour of old 35 mm film and/or VHS cassettes: they have errors. But  
these errors don't damage the whole archive.

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux