Re: status of raid10 reliability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011-11-17 17:09:25 +0000, Stephane CHAZELAS:
[...]
> Before setting up a new RAID10 btrfs array with 6 drives, I
> wanted to check how good it behaved in case of disk failure.
> I've not been too impressed. Is RAID10 btrfs support only
> meant for reading performance improvement?
> 
> My test method was:
> 
> Use the device-mapper to have devices mapped (linear) to loop
> devices
[...]
> Then write some data, and then use DM's error target to simulate
> a failing drive (all I/O ends up in error):
> 
> # dmsetup suspend hd3; echo 0 $s error | dmsetup reload hd3; dmsetup resume hd3
[...]

Note that I did the same test with both md (raid10) and
zfsonlinux (raidz) and it worked as expected.

-- 
Stephane
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux