Re: [PATCH 1/6] Btrfs: Abstract similar code for btrfs_block_rsv_add{, _noflush}()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:31:08PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> The mail of PATCH 0 was always rejected, so I try to send it as the
> reply of PATCH 1.
> ====================
> Title: [PATCH 0/6] Random fix of the space relocation
> 
> This patchset fixes 5 bugs of the space relocation, one fixes the problem
> that we forgot to reserve space for writing out i-node cache, one fixes
> that the path is not released, this problem may cause the deadlock.
> one fixes the no-cow problem, this problem will break the meta-data.
> one fixes the deadlock that caused by the race between the relocation
> and the snapshot creation, the last one fixes BUG_ON() which is triggered
> by the orphan back-ref nodes.
> 
> NOTE: This patchset is based on the danger branch.

Thanks!  For future patches, please use the for-linus branch instead.
danger still has the subtransid code, which we need to fix

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux