Re: How to remount btrfs without compression?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/10/2011 03:57 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Dmitry Olenin, Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:03:39 +0900:

On 11/09/2011 04:48 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Sorry for possibly OT question - when I have historical btrfs system
mounted with zlib compression,

can I remount it with lzo ? What will happen? Will the COW be broken
and the files taking duplicate space? Or will the Universe explode and
be replaced with something even more bizzare?

Hello Lubos If you have a kernel that supports lzo (don't quite remember
when it got in), why can't you?
Absolutely nothing will happen, and only the new/updated files will be
with lzo compression. You can remount on the fly switching b/w the two
compression options without any problems.

Hello Dmitry,

By the way, this is interesting question to me - I mounted the filesystem
with -o compress=lzo, in dmesg showed btrfs: use lzo compression,

but - the lzo module was not loaded (not shown in lsmod - and yes, I have
it as a module).

When I do modprobe lzo, it shows there.

Isn't it a bit strange? So btrfs is using lzo module that was not loaded?
(and says so in the dmesg output)?

Hello Lubos
Yes, I was wondering about this too when I started doing lzo.
The lzo module you load most likely has nothing to do with btrfs. This is the only explanation. I would think that lzo for btrfs is built into kernel. Unfortunately I don't have my .config with me at the moment to check it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux