On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:19:18AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2011, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The last one isn't a bad idea, but please do make a real mount option
> > for it ;)
>
> Like this?
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static match_table_t tokens = {
{Opt_subvolrootid, "subvolrootid=%d"},
{Opt_defrag, "autodefrag"},
{Opt_inode_cache, "inode_cache"},
+ {Opt_nocluster, "nocluster"},
{Opt_err, NULL},
How about 'no_alloc_cluster' ? Or something suggesting it's related to
allocation. At least we're not in situation of ocfs2 where are clusters in
block-gouping- but also host-grouping sense, so I'm fine with nocluster. Just
in case somebody has a better idea for the option name.
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
