I've also got the basis of a set of regression tests for -progs, which I'll send out patches for in the next couple of days. At the moment, it only tests building and snapshots, but should be relatively easily extensible to the other bits of ./btrfs (although I'm not sure how we can easily and repeatably test the recovery tools).Please talk with Anand Jain on the test programs, he has been making scripts for xfs-tests.Will do, although I think we're aiming at different things. I'm very definitely *not* attempting to test the filesystem itself with my test harness. I just want to exercise all the bits of the userspace tools that I can. (This was primarily triggered by the mess surrounding the parsing of "btrfs sub snap" parameters).
Testing the (btrfs) CLI wasn't aimed in the xfs-tests instead the FS itself. Appears that btrfs CLI syntax-change is upcoming what we might also need is a CLI to check the version of both btrfs and btrfs-progs to ensure tools surrounding them will report -incompatible instead of syntax error. thanks. -Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
