(2011/10/27 3:26), Hugo Mills wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:51:31PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: >> It still doesn't appear to have returned to kernel.org. Should that >> happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now? > > If the wiki was up (which should be coming back to kernel.org in > the next few weeks, I'm told), you'd be able to see that the latest > version of the tools is actually available from > > http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ Though the check on the number of args has been changed with the following patch, commit:f71210f87e0c684d8c76dfa2e19ea86256fc3d1f check number of args for btrfs sub snap correctly however, in integration-20111012, I think that returning it to an original value is correct. Thanks, Tsutomu diff -urNp a/btrfs_cmds.c b/btrfs_cmds.c --- a/btrfs_cmds.c 2011-10-12 19:54:48.000000000 +0900 +++ b/btrfs_cmds.c 2011-10-27 09:07:56.000000000 +0900 @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ int do_clone(int argc, char **argv) return 1; } } - if (argc - optind != 3) { + if (argc - optind != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot\n"); free(argv); return 1; > > If you want something more recent than 6 months old, you will need > either the for-chris branch (considered pretty stable), or the latest > integration branch (which is the very latest bits). Gitweb access for > browsing is at > > http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary > > Hugo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
