On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:23:38PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:47:15PM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote: > > The sizes get initialized to 4096, but after the super block is read, > > these are replaced by those from the SB. > > [reads sources again] right, and the initial values are not used up to > that point, so 4096 could be any number. > > > It was indeed meant to get rid of the possibility to have different > > sizes for different trees, as it just adds complexity. Chris mentioned > > once that he does not intend to allow different sizes between trees, > > thus the idea for this cleanup. > > Ok then. I'll gather it to cleanup patch queue. Thanks, I actually don't intend to allow different leaf and node sizes anymore either, but we might as well keep both numbers. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
