-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/24/2011 01:45 AM, dima wrote: > Hello Phillip, > It is hard to judge without seeing your fstab and bootloader config. Maybe your > / was directly in subvolid=0 without creating a separate subvolume for it (like > __active in Goffredo's reply)? In my very humble opinion, if you have your @home > subvolume under subvolid=0 and then change the default subvolume, it just cannot > access your @home any more. Why can't it? It appears that Ubuntu sets up two subvols, one named @ and one named @home, and mounts them at / and /home respectively. The boot loader was set to pass rootflags=subvol=@. After changing the default volume, the system would not boot until I removed that rootflags argument, then it mounted the snapshot correctly as the root, but refused to mount /home, giving this nonsense error that /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device. > Here is a very good article that explains the working of subvolumes. I used it > as reference a lot. > http://www.funtoo.org/wiki/BTRFS_Fun#Using_snapshots_for_system_recovery_.28aka_Back_to_the_Future.29 This advice seems completely goofy. It tells you to change the default subvol and boot from the snapshot, but then to have rsync copy all of the files back to the default volume, then switch back to using that. This seems to defeat the entire purpose. If you are already booting from the snapshot, why would you want to waste time copying the files back to the original subvol instead of just deleting it, and using the snapshot volume from now on? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6mBo4ACgkQJ4UciIs+XuK+wgCeOD0km3GpdseQ0h4y0FKSI7JS xC0An2JqA4aOHCkZ7+g+TORunVnpmQj7 =6KKf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
